PDA

View Full Version : (Politics) KUCINICH OUT!


paularoid
01-24-2008, 02:41 PM
Details as they come in, but right now (I'm listening to it as I type this in) David Schuster on MSNBC is announcing that presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich is tossing in the towel. He's done. He won't run. :mad:

-My- support now shifts to Edwards.

----- minutes later -----

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080124/ap_on_el_pr/kucinich_withdraws;_ylt=AjzFwU.Vxms5nYFCqOyuwJuyFz 4D

Kucinich abandons White House bid

By JOE MILICIA, Associated Press Writer 1 minute ago

Democrat Dennis Kucinich is abandoning his second, long-shot bid for the White House as he faces a tough fight to hold onto his other job — U.S. congressman.

In an interview with Cleveland's Plain Dealer, the six-term House member said he was quitting the race and would make a formal announcement on Friday.

"I will be announcing that I'm transiting out of the presidential campaign," Kucinich said. "I'm making that announcement tomorrow about a new direction."

Kucinich has received little support in his presidential bid; he got 1 percent of the vote in the New Hampshire primary and was shut out in the Iowa caucuses although he has a devoted following.

Kucinich, 61, is facing four challengers in the Democratic congressional primary March 4, and earlier this week he made an urgent appeal on his Web site for funds for his re-election. Rival Joe Cimperman has been critical of Kucinich for focusing too much time outside of his district while campaigning for president.

His decision comes a month after his youngest brother, Perry Kucinich, was found dead.

Kucinich said he will not endorse another Democrat in the primary.

Kucinich brought the same sense of idealism to his second run for president as he did in his first bid. He said he was entering the race again because the Democratic Party wasn't pushing hard enough to end the Iraq war.

Once dubbed the "boy mayor" of Cleveland, he made an unpopular decision to refuse to sell a publicly owned utility that pushed the city into default and drove him from office.

After the city's financial troubles, the mayor faced death threats, and was forced to wear a bulletproof vest when he threw out the first ball at a Cleveland Indians game. He barely survived a recall vote.

But he lost his bid for re-election as mayor of Cleveland in 1978 to Republican George Voinovich, who went on to become governor and then U.S. senator. His life and his political career were derailed. Kucinich spent more than a decade trying to get back into politics — traveling around the country and then working as a teacher, consultant and television news reporter.

In 1994, Kucinich was elected state senator and he then won a seat in Congress in 1996. His once unpopular stand against the sale of the municipal electric system was praised as courageous. In 1998, the Cleveland City Council issued him a commendation for having the foresight to refuse to sell it.

During his time in Congress, Kucinich has been one of the most outspoken liberals, opposing international trade agreements like the North America Free Trade Agreement and marching with protesters in Seattle during a meeting of the World Trade Organization.

As a presidential candidate, he has proposed a Department of Peace, backed universal health care and supported gay marriage. He also pushed for impeachment of Vice President Dick Cheney.

Kucinich married British citizen Elizabeth Harper, in 2005, ensuring his 2008 campaign would have one dramatic difference from his first campaign. Kucinich told New Hampshire audiences during the 2004 race that he was seeking a mate. Women then vied for a date with him during a contest arranged by a New Hampshire political Web site, but nothing romantic evolved from Kucinich's breakfast with the winner.

hoops
01-24-2008, 07:16 PM
Paul, i'm sorry... Go Edwards!
peace
hoops

DaveM
01-24-2008, 09:57 PM
I'd like to see him form his own party and run as an Independent. His ideas are certainly that, and should not be pigeonholed along with all the rest of the dustbunny philosophy of the two "major" parties.

paularoid
01-24-2008, 09:59 PM
Paul, i'm sorry... Go Edwards!
peace
hoops
While -I- support Edwards that doesn't mean that everyone should. Everyone should support the candidate of THEIR choice, whether it be Clinton, Obama, Edwards, Gravel, or any of the republican candidates. I only ask that the voters be as fully informed about their chosen candidate and more importantly, the issues involved and where their candidate of choice stands on those issues.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v25/paularoid/JIMB/voteicon.jpg

paularoid
01-25-2008, 03:22 PM
Here's the Edwards website link:

http://www.johnedwards.com/

And more importantly for the geekier crowd, his .rss feed to keep tabs on this site continually:

http://www.johnedwards.com/news/rss/

-----

Dear [ Friend's Name ]:

I want to tell you about John Edwards' campaign for President -- a campaign that calls on all of us to begin taking action now to change our country and ensure America's greatness in the 21st century.

We cannot wait until January of 2009 to begin to change America -- and if we act together, we can make a difference today.

Please take a moment to check out the campaign website at:

www.JohnEdwards.com

If you're ready to take responsibility for changing our country, please join me at:

www.JohnEdwards.com/action/join/campaign/

Sincerely,

[ Your Name ]



http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v25/paularoid/Misc/email-signature.jpg

hoops
01-25-2008, 05:01 PM
Paul,
I do understand that i need to choose my own candidate... i was just trying to cheer you up a bit after kucinich walked away...thanks my friend
peace
hoops

paularoid
01-25-2008, 05:35 PM
Paul,
I do understand that i need to choose my own candidate... i was just trying to cheer you up a bit after kucinich walked away...thanks my friend
peace
hoops
Oh I understand that,... but I haven't got time to be sad, cheerful, or anything other than what I am,... and that's MAD! I'm mad at the current administration and the majority of the repugs (or more properly "neocons") trying to get in. I'm not mad at Ron Paul but that's a whole other story that I'll get into in a sec. I just got through watching a clip from the last repug debate where moderator Tim Russert asked them all whether or not they thought it was a good idea that we (the U.S.) went into Iraq and was it worth all the bloodshed and lives lost. Except for Ron Paul they -all- of them said it was a good idea that the U.S. went to Iraq. None of them (Ron Paul excepted) said anything about the cost of the lives lost and the bloodshed. They all just gave doubletalk that didn't say much of anything and really served no purpose other than to deflect that particular portion of the two-parted question.

About Ron Paul
Ron Paul says a LOT of good things about Iraq - BUT - he also says some -really- questionable things about other portions of how the country should be managed. He wants to do away with taxes altogether. I like that idea but it leaves questions about how we're going to finance all the things that our taxes now support. That's only one example. I haven't got time nor space to get into the rest except maybe one. There are also very questionable, potentially rascist issues in his past regarding his newsletter a few years ago. He -may- have convincingly explained it away as the fact that his newsletter was run and managed by someone else. My big question is if you can't ride herd on or manage your own newsletter then how can you be expected to run the most militarily powerful and potentially destructive nation on the face of the earth?




http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v25/paularoid/Misc/email-signature.jpg