PDA

View Full Version : (Politics) The other censored candidate



paularoid
01-17-2008, 03:41 PM
Paularoid

There's another candidate in addition to Ron Paul who is being iced out of the US news media coverage.

Here's what he's saying:

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/260.html

- Brasscheck

P.S. Please share Brasscheck TV e-mails and videos with friends and colleagues.

That's how we grow.

- Brasscheck

P.S. Please share Brasscheck TV e-mails and videos with friends and colleagues.

That's how we grow. Thanks.

==============================



Brasscheck TV
2380 California St.
San Francisco, CA 94115

To unsubscribe or change subscriber options visit:
<removed so you don't unsubscribe me> ;)


-- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.5/1228 - Release Date: 1/16/08 9:01 AM

Wildflower Fever
01-17-2008, 04:46 PM
I hate to admit it, but I'm a horribly biased liberal. Therefore, although I believe in fairness, I'm not sorry to see Ron Paul excluded. I like how he "seems" different than other repubs, but that's only on the surface. What's scary to me is how many presumably left-leaning youths are being swayed by Paul in this short-attention-span-theater media world we live in. Yes, he wants to bring our troops home, but after that, nearly all his ideas become more loony and alarming. He wants to dismatle the fed, and make us an isolationist nation. Again, I agree in fairness doctrine, but in his case, we don't need to help the confused, fat, and selfish modern day youth make this wrong decision. That said , he probably doesn't have a chance anyway.

paularoid
01-17-2008, 06:43 PM
I hate to admit it, but I'm a horribly biased liberal. Therefore, although I believe in fairness, I'm not sorry to see Ron Paul excluded. I like how he "seems" different than other repubs, but that's only on the surface. What's scary to me is how many presumably left-leaning youths are being swayed by Paul in this short-attention-span-theater media world we live in. Yes, he wants to bring our troops home, but after that, nearly all his ideas become more loony and alarming. He wants to dismatle the fed, and make us an isolationist nation. Again, I agree in fairness doctrine, but in his case, we don't need to help the confused, fat, and selfish modern day youth make this wrong decision. That said , he probably doesn't have a chance anyway.
You didn't click the link, now -did- you? ;) :rolleyes:

It's not about Ron Paul. It's about the -other- excluded candidates. Specifically it's about Dennis Kucinich (imagine that :p ). All that being said, I agree what you say about Ron Paul. Anybody that's worth their salt and actually does a little research on the guy will realize that although there are some things that he says about the current running (or ruining) of our government that make a LOT of sense, his view on other things in other areas can actually be appalling when you think about it.

The only reason that the person even mentioned Ron Paul in his sending of the message above is because Ron Paul is drawing so much notoriety these days because of his exclusion. I think he's just trying to even things out and let everybody know that there are at least two presidential considerations that the powers-that-be seem to be conspiring against. I should also add that there are more than just these two. This exclusion also seems to be happening in the case of Gravel on the democratic side and Hunter on the Republican side.

We as citizens should have equal access to ALL the candidates and ALL their opinions no matter how strange or convoluted we may deem them to be.