PDA

View Full Version : The Album, a Commodity in Disfavor



Oak Kitten
03-29-2007, 08:16 PM
I found this article in the New York Times to be pretty interesting:

March 26, 2007
The Album, a Commodity in Disfavor
By JEFF LEEDS

Correction Appended

LOS ANGELES, March 25 — Now that the three young women in Candy Hill, a glossy rap and R&B trio, have signed a record contract, they are hoping for stardom. On the schedule: shooting a music video and visiting radio stations to talk up their music.

But the women do not have a CD to promote. Universal/Republic Records, their label, signed Candy Hill to record two songs, not a complete album.

“If we get two songs out, we get a shot,” said Vatana Shaw, 20, who formed the trio four years ago, “Only true fans are buying full albums. Most people don’t really do that anymore.”

To the regret of music labels everywhere, she is right: fans are buying fewer and fewer full albums. In the shift from CDs to digital music, buyers can now pick the individual songs they like without having to pay upward of $10 for an album.

Last year, digital singles outsold plastic CD’s for the first time. So far this year, sales of digital songs have risen 54 percent, to roughly 189 million units, according to data from Nielsen SoundScan. Digital album sales are rising at a slightly faster pace, but buyers of digital music are purchasing singles over albums by a margin of 19 to 1.

Because of this shift in listener preferences — a trend reflected everywhere from blogs posting select MP3s to reviews of singles in Rolling Stone — record labels are coming to grips with the loss of the album as their main product and chief moneymaker.

In response, labels are re-examining everything from their marketing practices to their contracts. One result is that offers are cropping up for artists like Candy Hill to record only ring tones or a clutch of singles, according to talent managers and lawyers.

At the same time, the industry is straining to shore up the album as long as possible, in part by prodding listeners who buy one song to purchase the rest of a collection. Apple, in consultation with several labels, has been planning to offer iTunes users credit for songs they have already purchased if they then choose to buy the associated album in a certain period of time, according to people involved in the negotiations. (Under Apple’s current practice, customers who buy a song and then the related album effectively pay for the song twice).

But some analysts say they doubt that such promotions can reverse the trend.

“I think the album is going to die,” said Aram Sinnreich, managing partner at Radar Research, a media consulting firm based in Los Angeles. “Consumers are listening to play lists,” or mixes of single songs from an assortment of different artists. “Consumers who have had iPods since they were in the single digits are going to increasingly gravitate toward artists who embrace that.”

All this comes as the industry’s long sales slide has been accelerating. Sales of albums, in either disc or digital form, have dropped more than 16 percent so far this year, a slide that executives attribute to an unusually weak release schedule and shrinking retail floor space for music. Even though sales of individual songs — sold principally through iTunes — are rising, it has not been nearly enough to compensate.

Many music executives dispute the idea that the album will disappear. In particular, they say, fans of jazz, classical, opera and certain rock (bands like Radiohead and Tool) will demand album-length listening experiences for many years to come. But for other genres — including some strains of pop music, rap, R&B and much of country — where sales success is seen as closely tied to radio air play of singles, the album may be entering its twilight.

“For some genres and some artists, having an album-centric plan will be a thing of the past,” said Jeff Kempler, chief operating officer of EMI’s Capitol Music Group. While the traditional album provides value to fans, he said, “perpetuating a business model that fixates on a particular packaged product configuration is inimical to what the Internet enables, and it’s inimical to what many consumers have clearly voted for.”

Another solution being debated in the industry would transform record labels into de facto fan clubs. Companies including the Warner Music Group and the EMI Group have been considering a system in which fans would pay a fee, perhaps monthly, to “subscribe” to their favorite artists and receive a series of recordings, videos and other products spaced over time.

Executives maintain that they must establish more lasting connections with fans who may well lose interest if forced to wait two years or more before their favorite artist releases new music.

A decade ago, the music industry had all but stopped selling music in individual units. But now, four years after Apple introduced its iTunes service — selling singles for 99 cents apiece and full albums typically for $9.99 — individual songs account for roughly two-thirds of all music sales volume in the United States. And that does not count purchases of music in other, bite-size forms like ring tones, which have sold more than 54 million units so far this year, according to Nielsen data.

One of the biggest reasons for the shift, analysts say, is that consumers — empowered to cherry-pick — are forgoing album purchases after years of paying for complete CD’s with too few songs they like. There are still cases where full albums succeed — the Red Hot Chili Peppers’ double-CD “Stadium Arcadium,” with a weighty 28 tracks, has sold almost two million copies. But the overall pie is shrinking.

In some ways, the current climate recalls the 1950s and to some extent, the 60s, when many popular acts sold more singles than albums. It took greatly influential works like The Beatles’ “Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band” and the Beach Boys’ “Pet Sounds” to turn the album into pop music’s medium of choice.

But the music industry’s cost structure is far higher than it was when Bob Dylan picked up an electric guitar. Today’s costs — from television ads and music videos to hefty executive salaries — are still built on blockbuster albums.

Hence the emergence of scaled-back deals with acts like Candy Hill. Labels have signed new performers to singles deals before, typically to release what they viewed as ephemeral or novelty hits. Now, executives at Universal say, such arrangements will become more common for even quality acts because the single itself is the end product.

With Candy Hill, Universal paid a relatively small advance — described as being in “five figures” — to cover recording expenses. Ms. Shaw, who formed the group with Casha Darjean and Ociris Gomez, said the members had kept their day jobs working at an insurance company and doing other vocal work to be able to pay the rent at the house where they live together.

If one of their songs turns into a big hit, they hope to release a full album, and to tap other income sources, like touring and merchandise sales.

But turning a song into a hit does not appear to be getting any easier.

Ron Shapiro, an artist manager and former president of Atlantic Records, asked, “What are the Las Vegas odds of constantly having a ‘Bad Day?’ ” — referring to a tune by the singer Daniel Powter that sold more than two million copies after it was used on “American Idol.”

While music labels labor to build careers for artists that are suited for albums, he added, “You have to create an almost hysterical pace to find hits to sell as digital downloads and ring tones that everybody’s going to want. It’s scary.”

Correction: March 28, 2007

A picture caption in Business Day on Monday, with an article about the shift by consumers to digital music from CDs, misstated the name of the band that had signed a deal to record two songs rather than a full album. It is Candy Hill, not Cherry Hill.

DaveM
03-29-2007, 11:57 PM
This strikes me as a consequence, not so much, of digital music availability, but on the industry's ongoing reliance on one-hit wonders who clog the airwaves for a month or so and then are heard no more (only to be superceded by the latest plastic "American Idol" product). Not that complaints about "buying a whole album to get one song" are anything new--I've expressed my share over the years (all the more so with an "album" often consisting of 8-10 songs instead of 12 or more). And there's plenty of room for one-hit wonders.

Listening only to a single, however, does a grave disservice to the artist who has perhaps been recording for decades and who puts an album together by drawing on a body of material, selecting a complementary group of songs which hold more meaning as a collection than they do individually. This is most true of course for those who record concept albums--Pink Floyd and the Moody Blues never belonged on 45s and don't fit well on CD singles either.

Perhaps the ever-shrinking attention span of the industry's beloved 14 year olds is an influence as well. But I haven't been 14 in 30 years. And I buy albums.

GodSistah
03-30-2007, 12:05 AM
This is just sad.

:(

~Andrea~

DaveM
03-30-2007, 03:50 PM
You know what I miss about albums (the vinyl kind)? The jacket art, some of which was worth framing. And the funky "extras" that sometime came inside. Somewhere I still have my gatefold copy of "Dark Side Of The Moon", which came with two posters, stickers, and some other cool stuff, all of which is still in there. If I remember right, practically every Alan Parsons album had "goodies" included as well.

Does anyone else remember LP "picture disks"? Music stores used to put them in window displays and charge a small fortune for them.

Bat
03-30-2007, 10:15 PM
Does anyone else remember LP "picture disks"? Music stores used to put them in window displays and charge a small fortune for them.

Hell, I remember a 78rpm, 10" picture disk...Hank Williams, 'Smoke, smoke, smoke that Cigarette'. Released shortly before 33 rpm LPs became 'the' thing.

DaveM
03-31-2007, 12:31 AM
Bet you wish you had it now....

Stephen
03-31-2007, 06:58 AM
Hell, I remember a 78rpm, 10" picture disk...Hank Williams, 'Smoke, smoke, smoke that Cigarette'. Released shortly before 33 rpm LPs became 'the' thing.

I suspect that would be Tex Williams, not Hank. We had a copy of the 78 (not a picture disk) around the place when I was a kid. I had the picture disks album from the first Lord of the Rings movie (the animated one) but alas lost them and most of my other belongings in a flood about 15 years ago. :(

David from London
03-31-2007, 08:47 AM
I used to have the original of the Bunch, a group of musicians including Sandy Denny.

The original had a small flimsy disc which fitted into a slot on the cover as well as the LP inside.

Oh, how I wish I still had it. Somewhere the flimsy disc got lost and then at some stage it didn't seem worth keeping the rest.

But I wish I had.

On the question of albums vs downloading, the only time I would download in preference to buying the entire album is if a singer I liked had one song on a collection which wasn't otherwise available. But even then you sometimes find that if you like one sing on a collection, you might like others.

Bat
03-31-2007, 12:29 PM
I suspect that would be Tex Williams, not Hank

You're absolutely right, and Phil Harris had a good one out of that, too.
It's rather a rap song, but catchy and clever.

http://www.tobacco.org/History/Smoke_Cigarette.html

Thanks for the correction, btw. :D