PDA

View Full Version : Will Janis have to rewrite Married in London? (Political content)



Dee
12-05-2006, 04:24 AM
I sure hope not.

Tory motion is set to reignite gay marriage debate in Commons (http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/061204/national/same_sex)

OTTAWA (CP) - Christian activists will make life hell on the next campaign trail for MPs who break their vows to protect traditional marriage, says a staunch opponent of gay weddings.

Charles McVety, head of the independent Defend Marriage movement, will be in Ottawa on Wednesday when Parliament is set to debate a Conservative motion that could reopen Liberal schisms on a touchy subject.

It calls on the government to introduce legislation to restore the traditional definition of marriage "while respecting existing same-sex marriages." A vote is expected Thursday.

More than 12,000 gay couples across Canada have wed since court rulings recognizing their unions forced a parliamentary vote last year that legalized same-sex marriage.

McVety says he'll be closely watching more than 30 Liberal MPs who voted against gay weddings. Many have publicly said they'll work to restore marriage as the exclusive domain of one man, one woman.

<snip>

New Liberal Leader Stephane Dion called the Tory motion a disturbing move that potentially undermines the charter. A strong supporter of equal marriage, Dion said he would speak with MPs before deciding whether to "whip" the vote expected Thursday - forcing Liberals to reject revisiting the matter.

Laurie Arron, national co-ordinator of the independent group Canadians for Equal Marriage, says most voters simply want to move on.

"This is the third vote in three parliaments under three prime ministers," he said of a controversy that's been hashed out for years.

"It's quite clear that Canadians are sick and tired of this debate."

That includes several Conservatives who know the issue is politically toxic.

"Even people who don't like (the idea) understand that the equal marriage ship has sailed," Arron said.

aabram
12-05-2006, 11:15 AM
You've got a point there, Dee. Live and let live. That's what I say, anyway. There are more important issues to be dealt with, and when dd anyone ever listen to the Tories, anyway..... :)

Dee
12-07-2006, 06:02 AM
Yes! Far more important issues to be sure. Halfwits.

MPs set to vote on same-sex marriage (http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2006/12/07/same-sex.html)
Last Updated: Thursday, December 7, 2006 | 12:21 AM ET

CBC News

Parliamentary wrangling over same-sex marriage could be settled Thursday with the expected failure of a motion on whether or not to reopen the issue.

The motion calls on the government to "introduce legislation to restore the traditional definition of marriage without affecting civil unions and while respecting existing same-sex marriages.''

But the majority of Liberals are expected to oppose the motion and both the Bloc and NDP are forcing their members to vote against it, meaning the motion has virtually no chance of passing.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper has said if the House votes against changing the motion, the matter would be settled.

During the election campaign, Harper promised to hold a free vote in the House of Commons on whether Parliament should revisit the issue.

Both Harper and Liberal Leader Stéphane Dion are allowing their MPs to vote freely.

"There will be a free vote to prove that an overwhelming majority of my MPs are not willing to vote with the government on this issue," Dion said before the debate on the issue Wednesday.

"We want that to be over … It will be the end of the story."

Dee
12-07-2006, 03:11 PM
MPs defeat motion to reopen same-sex marriage debate (http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2006/12/07/vote-samesex.html)

Last Updated: Thursday, December 7, 2006 | 4:53 PM ET

CBC News

A motion to reopen the same-sex marriage debate was easily defeated in Parliament on Thursday, as expected.

MPs voted 175-123 against the controversial motion tabled by the ruling Conservatives.

The motion had asked the government to introduce legislation to restore the traditional definition of marriage without affecting civil unions and while respecting existing same-sex marriages.

The Liberal and Conservative parties allowed their members to vote freely, and there were some surprises.

Twelve Tories broke from party lines and voted against the motion. They included cabinet ministers Peter MacKay, David Emerson, John Baird, Jim Prentice, Lawrence Cannon and Josée Verner.

Most Liberals also gave the motion the thumbs down. Among them were Joe Comuzzi, who gave up his cabinet post in 2005 so he could vote against a same-sex marriage bill proposed by the Liberal government.

All Bloc Québécois and NDP members present voted against Thursday's motion, as directed to by their party leaders.

The vote should put an end to parliamentary wrangling about same-sex marriage, as Prime Minister Stephen Harper had said a free vote — promised during January's general election campaign — would settle the matter.

(more ...)